Peer review policy
REASER deems the peer review essential for the publishing process. It validates and confirms an author’s work and establishes a method by which a manuscript can be effectively evaluated.
If the
manuscript is sent for review, it will be evaluated in a double-blind
peer-review process, which takes approximately 5 to 6 months, not
including any time of revision by the author. Therefore, the whole review
process (from the submission time to the decision on whether to reject or send
the manuscript through peer review and to the final editorial decision) could
last approximately 6 to 9 months, depending on the editorial workflow. Only the
manuscripts which respect the REASER Template (and all the instructions included in the template) will
be sent for peer review.
REASER has a mandatory
ORCID field (Open Researcher and Contributor ID) that must be filled in as
part of the submission process.
All corresponding
authors for REASER articles must supply an ORCID identifier as part
of the submission process. If the corresponding author does not already have an
ID, they will need to create one to submit a manuscript to REASER. More
information about ORCID is available at https://orcid.org/
Most REASER reviewers are authors, well-known Ph D researchers and professors from all over the world, or sometimes the editors themselves.
All articles submissions will be forwarded to two reviewers for double-blind peer review. The final decision regarding acceptance, minor or major revision, or rejection of an article will be based on the evaluation reports received from the reviewers. |